LOGIN  .  SIGNUP   .  REWARDS   .  PRIZE WHEEL   .  RC STORE   .  SUPPORT 
/ / / / DO NOT BUY THIS GAME WHAT A WASTE

Rage Discussion

 
Rage Trainer
 

Trainer Tools and Resources

Request More Trainer Options for Rage
0 option(s) for voting
File Trainer Update Request for Rage
1 report(s) filed
Boost Trainer Update Priority for Rage
Boost currently not available

Message Board for PC version

Signup   Message Boards Home   Newest Posts   My Favorite Boards   My Threads
Page 3 of 5   •  First Page  •  Previous Page  •   Next Page  •   Last Page
Signup or Login to Post
Do not buy this game what a waste
 
Monkey007  posted on Oct 06, 2011 9:10:06 AM - Report post

Current rank: 2 Stars. Next Rank at 1000 Posts.
Send a message to Monkey007
ELITE
I fail to see how a game's size is of any importance at all... it's not like this game is more lengthy than the average game.

In fact, I am suprised some people finished it because it's such a mess. Loads of people can't even finish it, and those that did, did so in about 15 hours.

 
Sutek  posted on Oct 06, 2011 9:18:21 AM - Report post

Premium Plus
Send a message to Sutek
ELITE
my question to those that finished it in 15 hours is: did you bother do any side quests or did you only do the main quest line? normally when people complain that a game is to short they haven't bothered do any side quests. i try to do side quests and exploring and not only focus on the main quest.
 
saurabhfzd  posted on Oct 06, 2011 9:26:57 AM - Report post

Current rank: 3 Stars. Next Rank at 4000 Posts.
Send a message to saurabhfzd
ELITE
quote:
originally posted by Monkey007

I fail to see how a game's size is of any importance at all... it's not like this game is more lengthy than the average game.

In fact, I am suprised some people finished it because it's such a mess. Loads of people can't even finish it, and those that did, did so in about 15 hours.

like it or not...size does matter to a lot of people. it also means tons of code and doesn't necessarily mean length of game-play. and tons of code means a lot of man-hours of effort gone into the game for which its only right for the developers to expect some pay-back. and length of game-play does happen to vary from person to person and even if we're to assume that 15 hours as average...i'd say that's a reasonable length.

 
Monkey007  posted on Oct 06, 2011 9:42:28 AM - Report post

Current rank: 2 Stars. Next Rank at 1000 Posts.
Send a message to Monkey007
ELITE
quote:
originally posted by saurabhfzd

quote:
originally posted by Monkey007

I fail to see how a game's size is of any importance at all... it's not like this game is more lengthy than the average game.

In fact, I am suprised some people finished it because it's such a mess. Loads of people can't even finish it, and those that did, did so in about 15 hours.

like it or not...size does matter to a lot of people. it also means tons of code and doesn't necessarily mean length of game-play. and tons of code means a lot of man-hours of effort gone into the game for which its only right for the developers to expect some pay-back. and length of game-play does happen to vary from person to person and even if we're to assume that 15 hours as average...i'd say that's a reasonable length.

And I absolutely agree... It's a good game, and I quite like it.
If only I could actually finish it, that would be nice.

 
saurabhfzd  posted on Oct 06, 2011 9:50:59 AM - Report post

Current rank: 3 Stars. Next Rank at 4000 Posts.
Send a message to saurabhfzd
ELITE
quote:
originally posted by Monkey007

quote:
originally posted by saurabhfzd

quote:
originally posted by Monkey007

I fail to see how a game's size is of any importance at all... it's not like this game is more lengthy than the average game.

In fact, I am suprised some people finished it because it's such a mess. Loads of people can't even finish it, and those that did, did so in about 15 hours.

like it or not...size does matter to a lot of people. it also means tons of code and doesn't necessarily mean length of game-play. and tons of code means a lot of man-hours of effort gone into the game for which its only right for the developers to expect some pay-back. and length of game-play does happen to vary from person to person and even if we're to assume that 15 hours as average...i'd say that's a reasonable length.

And I absolutely agree... It's a good game, and I quite like it.
If only I could actually finish it, that would be nice.

..yea..i hear ya...in-game races can be tough and challenging for some like it was in The Saboteur...and i personally don't think its right to link the progress of the game with winning a race.

 
benduhova  posted on Oct 06, 2011 10:41:23 AM - Report post

Current rank: 3 Stars. Next Rank at 4000 Posts.
Send a message to benduhova
HIM
quote:
originally posted by saurabhfzd

quote:
originally posted by Monkey007

I fail to see how a game's size is of any importance at all... it's not like this game is more lengthy than the average game.

In fact, I am suprised some people finished it because it's such a mess. Loads of people can't even finish it, and those that did, did so in about 15 hours.

like it or not...size does matter to a lot of people. it also means tons of code and doesn't necessarily mean length of game-play. and tons of code means a lot of man-hours of effort gone into the game for which its only right for the developers to expect some pay-back. and length of game-play does happen to vary from person to person and even if we're to assume that 15 hours as average...i'd say that's a reasonable length.

by payback i take it you mean by screwing consumers with a buggy release and late patching(why? we didnt make it buggy)that was the developers and what if it is 20gig im sure plenty of people have games less than 1gig that run sweet allday everyday

 
saurabhfzd  posted on Oct 06, 2011 11:16:40 AM - Report post

Current rank: 3 Stars. Next Rank at 4000 Posts.
Send a message to saurabhfzd
ELITE
quote:
originally posted by benduhova

quote:
originally posted by saurabhfzd

quote:
originally posted by Monkey007

I fail to see how a game's size is of any importance at all... it's not like this game is more lengthy than the average game.

In fact, I am suprised some people finished it because it's such a mess. Loads of people can't even finish it, and those that did, did so in about 15 hours.

like it or not...size does matter to a lot of people. it also means tons of code and doesn't necessarily mean length of game-play. and tons of code means a lot of man-hours of effort gone into the game for which its only right for the developers to expect some pay-back. and length of game-play does happen to vary from person to person and even if we're to assume that 15 hours as average...i'd say that's a reasonable length.

by payback i take it you mean by screwing consumers with a buggy release and late patching(why? we didnt make it buggy)that was the developers and what if it is 20gig im sure plenty of people have games less than 1gig that run sweet allday everyday

it still takes a lot of work buggy as hell or not. and i'm well aware of the comparison between a 20gig game running poorly and 1gig game running super smooth especially from a time when games weren't so graphically complicated and didn't have to try and make one size fit all. i still remember playing Contra back in 1982 and do remember thoroughly enjoying it.

 
benduhova  posted on Oct 06, 2011 11:36:20 AM - Report post

Current rank: 3 Stars. Next Rank at 4000 Posts.
Send a message to benduhova
HIM
quote:
originally posted by saurabhfzd

quote:
originally posted by benduhova

quote:
originally posted by saurabhfzd

quote:
originally posted by Monkey007

I fail to see how a game's size is of any importance at all... it's not like this game is more lengthy than the average game.

In fact, I am suprised some people finished it because it's such a mess. Loads of people can't even finish it, and those that did, did so in about 15 hours.

like it or not...size does matter to a lot of people. it also means tons of code and doesn't necessarily mean length of game-play. and tons of code means a lot of man-hours of effort gone into the game for which its only right for the developers to expect some pay-back. and length of game-play does happen to vary from person to person and even if we're to assume that 15 hours as average...i'd say that's a reasonable length.

by payback i take it you mean by screwing consumers with a buggy release and late patching(why? we didnt make it buggy)that was the developers and what if it is 20gig im sure plenty of people have games less than 1gig that run sweet allday everyday

it still takes a lot of work buggy as hell or not. and i'm well aware of the comparison between a 20gig game running poorly and 1gig game running super smooth especially from a time when games weren't so graphically complicated and didn't have to try and make one size fit all. i still remember playing Contra back in 1982 and do remember thoroughly enjoying it.

yes but hard work doesnt mean good work anymore there are only two types of graphics card makers and they still couldnt get both to work after 5 years of development does that really deserve a pat on the back and telling them dont worry youll get it right in another 5 years. WHY ARE WE SO KEEN TO BEND OVER AND TAKE IT its not like they kiss you and remeber your name after the fact

Page 3 of 5   •  First Page  •  Previous Page  •   Next Page  •   Last Page
  Post Reply
Go to page: 1  2  3  4  5 
All times are (GMT -06:00) Central Time (US & Canada). Current time is 2:24:49 PM
Cheat Happens Premium
 
* Access PC trainers and exclusive content
* Updated game trainers and cheats daily
* Get notified when new cheats are added
* Request which games get new trainers
* Priority support with any problem
 
Game Review
Latest Trainer
Rage Trainer
• Add Race Certificates
• Unlimited Health (IMPROVED)
• Mega Ammo
+ 8 more options
  Show all Cheats & Trainers