WWE SmackDown! vs. Raw 2008 Message Board  

Point to Elite and Jackal.




Next question:
- If you put all the wrestlers on the RAW roster in alphabetic order, who comes first?

Ashley

Batista is the real wrestler

I was under the impression she was asking for her release, but since shes still on WWE.com under RAW Superstars, you get the point.




Next question:
Person with the best argument gets 2 points.

Should or should not CM Punk be World Heavyweight Champion, and why?





[Edited by king-of-games, 7/6/2008 3:31:49 AM]

Well, it's good and not good.

the good thing: Edge lost the title, and changing is very good, that title on raw gives the WWE and raw different look, and thats great.

the bad thing: there's many superstars deserve this title on raw more than Punk, like Batista, especially Batista, I think Batista should won the title at night of champions, but then again, Punk will cash in his MITB sooner or later.

No. Cm Punk has not done anything memorable at his time at WWE. The only memorable things I can remember him doing are some of his matches against John Morrison. Sure, he is a good wrestler, but isn't Funaki a good wrestler? Fans love him, but again, look at the pops Funaki, among other good wrestlers are getting. A good champion has to have done something memorable, or have something memorable happen to him, he has to have his dues paid, and with CM Punk, this is far to be searched for.

Yes. The reason why is because he's ready to take on new and difficult challenges, and with the world heavyweight title in his hands, he would be able to experience what it is really like to be in that position. Although he's a new-ish generation superstar, i believe he has the potential to hold that title for a long amount of time. It was very unlikely for him to obtain the title, but since he has it, it's a big opportunity which is rare to find, so why not let him become the World Heavyweight Champion?

I'll admit a better candidate could've been found but he won the money the bank fair and square so I'm going to have to say Yes.

Punks a good wrestler with a promising future, he'll never rise to Cena or Triple H status but he's a hard worker with a positive attitude and doesn't give a about the backstage politics...he never caused a fuss over not being pushed (which most guys do) Punk just goes out there and wrestles, I respect that. It's always nice to see an underdog win a Championship (reminds me of Benoit for some reason), and anythings better than another dreaded Cena Title reign. Even if it's for a couple months Punk is deserving of the mark as Champion, time will tell if he'll live up to it...bottom line- Punks paid his dues and has worked hard to get here, he's deserving.

[Edited by Jackal, 7/6/2008 1:10:40 PM]