Al-pucino  posted on Jul 05, 2007 8:35:48 PM - Report post

cool, its gonna be varied time, so i dont need to drive at night all the time...cool.

MaxGhost  posted on Jul 05, 2007 8:46:42 PM - Report post

I happen to like nighttime more... when its daytime, there's always these sun reflexion thingys that get in the way and it blinds you view... (in some previous games)

I rather the night cause it has more of a "illegal" and "cool" feel to it. I just like it more...

JeanClaude32  posted on Jul 06, 2007 5:22:21 AM - Report post

if it would be varied time then it would be really cool cos u can drive whenever u want not drive all day or all night.

i wonder how will they make the headlights and taillights...i wonder whether they will make them turn on and off automatically or manualy from your keyboard. it wouldn't be a bad idea to put in signallights, then when u take a turn at 200 km/h u signal to the normal drivers that ur going in another direction so they can relax without the need to prepare for impact

JeanClaude32  posted on Jul 06, 2007 6:15:49 AM - Report post

i gotta say...if NFSC is a game then Gothic I is a super game and it's only from the year 2000.
if NFSPS is the same as carbon at the bug chapter then EA should pack they'r things and get the hell out of the game industry. i played only 2 races and at every race it had an error from a bug thats not been fixed. gothic 1 has bugs but u rarely meet them most of the times when u use cheats that's when they show up but not like in carbon...if u pass from one menu to another then instantenously it gets an error
i hope EA would make PS without bugs and especially without them...what's a game that has a tone of bugs in it if u can't play not even 5 minutes?

Chingy42007  posted on Jul 06, 2007 7:16:26 AM - Report post

No doubt the early versions of the game will be like that. PC games are almost like they are evolving as they go along... its only like 3, 4 months later the game is fully playable, bug-free. So don't give up on them so easily, cos there IS room for improvement. And try to take into consideration that Carbon WAS the best of all the NFS games, and they keep getting better. The sequel is always better than the prequel in this series.

JeanClaude32  posted on Jul 06, 2007 8:46:11 AM - Report post

ok but how come underground 1 and underground 2 are bug-free cos i didn't met so many errors in U1 and U2. so why not make PS the same as U1 and U2? why did they made U1 and U2 without bugs and NFSC full of bugs and they didn't released any fixing patches so they can fix these bugs only for the online part of the game. maybe NFSC is the best of the NFS games but as quality i prefer u2. it may not have some features as carbon but i can relax because u won't end up with errors just because some1 didn't had time to make a patch to fix just those bugs that occur frequently not all of 'em the only thing that u2 doesn't have which carbon has is the paint categories the paint colors and the numbers of vynils u can put on and of course the cars

i thought also if they could put in wing doors like the ones that ferrari enzo has not scissor doors like lambos doors

Chingy42007  posted on Jul 06, 2007 8:54:27 AM - Report post

NFSU duo = basic
XP (at the time) = advanced

NFSC = VERY advanced
XP = advanced

Soon:

NFSPS = extremely advanced
Vista = thru tha roof

That may help you to understand a bit better.

JeanClaude32  posted on Jul 06, 2007 9:19:53 AM - Report post

vista is junk...there's a new windows even newer than vista. i know which one is it...do u know?

and if some1 really made a patch that would fix most of the bugs from carbon then it will be like nfsu2

and what is with vista=thru the roof? which and whos roof

[Edited by JeanClaude32, 7/6/2007 9:20:55 AM]