Both call of duty games are really made for online, their stories are pretty weak like most war games and their campaigns are remarkably short. They are still great games, but not if your looking for a long story driven fps like bioshok or the half life series. Farcry 2 has a decent story but I'm not sure if you want to spend at least 15 minutes walking/driving to and from each step of every mission. If they had like a teleport in that game it would take an hour to beat the story, but since there is so much darn traveling it literally takes like 12 hours plus mostly just traveling.
Thank you for suggesting Farcry2. I'll look into it. Some people do find traveling around boring. I'm old (only 43 actually), but I do like to back it down now and take my time through games. Some of my children love the quick defeat of all AI enemies and the glory of it all. That is cool too. I remember the thrill of quickly turning Asteroids over when the Atari 2600 came out when I was a teen. I bragged much to my friends that I was the first of us to do so. I'm at an age where I want to slow down and enjoy gaming as a relaxing thing. I'll go to my favorite game spots Gamestop and Amazon.com and see who can cut me the best deal on it. Appreciate your input!
CoD 4 or Crisys and FEAR/FEAR2
Love your avatar! Felix is one of my youngest daughter's favorite characters. She thinks he is NUTS !!! I'll look into your suggestions. All of them seem promising
@Dhampy:Im talking about the one for the Pc that was released in 2007 and Halo would have to have been released in 1995 if number 2 were to be released in 1998 and they werent good enough back then to make a game like that.
[Edited by nedra12, 3/21/2009 8:44:12 PM]
The Halo games were far behind the times in all regards even when they were released. They have muddy graphics and have zero story and antiquated gameplay.
Half-Life was released in 1998 and that game is not only prettier than both Halo games which have been released for PC, but is the standard by which story and gameplay are still judged.
Halo are console games, and let them stay that way. They are not worthy of the PC or PC gamers.
@Dhampy:Im talking about the one for the Pc that was released in 2007 and Halo would have to have been released in 1995 if number 2 were to be released in 1998 and they werent good enough back then to make a game like that.
[Edited by nedra12, 3/21/2009 8:44:12 PM]
The Halo games were far behind the times in all regards even when they were released. They have muddy graphics and have zero story and antiquated gameplay.
Half-Life was released in 1998 and that game is not only prettier than both Halo games which have been released for PC, but is the standard by which story and gameplay are still judged.
Halo are console games, and let them stay that way. They are not worthy of the PC or PC gamers.
The only real difference between the the one on the Xbox and the one on the PC is that there are differnt controls but i agree with you anyway.