so i see i have no way to compare between the courses, it feels like the course i'm taking is customized for my living zone..
I am not wrong.
I have the qualification, and it is the same syllabus no matter where you are.
It is only basic stuff it covers, you won't get an in depth working knowledge of everything.
I am just saying for what you get with the MCSE is not worth the price tag, you could get more deeper qualifications for less the price totally and gain more knowledge from it.
[Edited by DABhand, 3/9/2013 12:05:21 AM]
642-70 Windows Server Network Infrastructure Configuration
640-70 Windows Server 2008 Active Directory Configuration
646-70 Windows Server 2008, Server Administrator
Course 10750: Monitoring and Operating a Private Cloud with System Center 2012
Course 10751: Configuring and Deploying a Private Cloud with System Center 2012
and i have few more unofficial moduls like:
Microsoft Exchange Server 2010
configuring win 7&8
[Edited by kingkob, 3/10/2013 8:34:20 AM]
I am currently taking the top three in school right now. I did 70-646 last semester and 70-642 this semester. They are largely the same material. Well.. they are when you work backwards like we are.
I have completed 3 Cisco courses as well, among other things.
You are learning on Windows Server 2008 R2, right? There are slight changes in comparison to standard Win2K8.
Microsoft is going to be deprecating these courses soon, if I remember correctly, in favor of the new Server 2012.
What DABhand was saying is completely true. There are better, cheaper certifications that you can go for. Though having Microsoft ones are good because of it's popularity.
about the cost i realize that this course is overpriced but i chose good collage, i could have pay 2500$ for a mediocre collage and now i regert i did'nt because the current collage is not only expensive it's overrated, i got the worst lecturer you can possibly imagine