It seems like CH is not as it was a few years ago.
First of all, I am appreciative of what you guys do, certainly. However, there is one simple fact that changes things up a bit, it is that I am paying you to do this.
Your unprovoked response really does show simply how much you care about your loyal customers, as well as CH's inability to use proper etiquette when addressing its customers.
On another note, YES Microsoft Flight is a game of which I currently very much enjoy. It's mechanisms are now unlike previous generations of which it is purely focused on simulation. A trainer would remove the limitations set forth by the defined capabilities and greatly enhance the experience. Isn't this what CH is about?
If you find that my constructive criticism is faulty, flawed, or simply not to your taste, then please explain instead of REBUKE. It really goes a long way for a site with a paid subscription model.
I expected more from a site I regular for over 4 years, but nevertheless you guys do good work. All I am doing now is requesting for a new trainer for a game I very much enjoy.
I think you're overreacting a little.
Besides, you did the same thing, and we all know two wrongs don't make a right, right? You still didn't even say what you expect from a trainer? Last time I checked, there wasn't an option to "press 1 to disable limitations set forth by the defined capabilities", or "press 2 to enhance the experience".
Your language also screams of high horses and looking down your nose. Relax. There's no need to fly off the handle.
Hmm I apologize if the language that I use is not in a fashion that is commonplace here. Any "flying off the handle" is not intended to be communicated by me.
We'll do it your way.
I would like:
Super speed: makes plane engines super powerful (toggle)
Increase speed by 100kts (per press)
Increase altitude by 1000ft (per press)
Enable crash-proof planes (toggle)
No fuel depletion (toggle)
No uneasy passengers (toggle)
Teleportation and location save options
You have my thanks. Let me know if I can help in any way.
You misunderstand. I don't make the trainers. I was merely trying to understand what you'd want from a trainer, though I still don't really understand the necessity for one. I play almost every game with a trainer, but I've never stopped to think Flight could use one.
Like PWiz said... it's a flight sim in the most literal sense. Try fiddling around with CoSMOS, or look around Google to see if anyone else has.
It seems like CH is not as it was a few years ago.
First of all, I am appreciative of what you guys do, certainly. However, there is one simple fact that changes things up a bit, it is that I am paying you to do this.
Your unprovoked response really does show simply how much you care about your loyal customers, as well as CH's inability to use proper etiquette when addressing its customers.
On another note, YES Microsoft Flight is a game of which I currently very much enjoy. It's mechanisms are now unlike previous generations of which it is purely focused on simulation. A trainer would remove the limitations set forth by the defined capabilities and greatly enhance the experience. Isn't this what CH is about?
If you find that my constructive criticism is faulty, flawed, or simply not to your taste, then please explain instead of REBUKE. It really goes a long way for a site with a paid subscription model.
I expected more from a site I regular for over 4 years, but nevertheless you guys do good work. All I am doing now is requesting for a new trainer for a game I very much enjoy.
Then it wouldn't be a flight simulator...the purpose of the game is to simulate flight in the most realistic settings possible. If you bought it to poke around with the program physics engine settings, you bought the wrong game.
A trainer will not be made for this game. Topic Locked.
Important Board Topics
Trending Topics