POLL: Military Option On The Table - Cheat Happens General Discussions Message Board (Page 1)
Cheat Happens Game Cheats and Wallpapers
Cheat Happens Game Cheats and Wallpapers
 
Cheat Happens Game Cheats and Wallpapers
 
     TRAINERS       REQUESTS       GAME REVIEWS       GAME WALLPAPERS       BOARDS
-OR-
  USE PROMO CODE "CHSAVE50" TO SAVE 50% ON OUR ONE YEAR MEMBERSHIP - EXPIRES FRIDAY! [ close ] 
 
     
  MESSAGE BOARD LINKS:   SIGNUP    |    BOARDS HOME    |   MY FAVORITE BOARDS    |   NEWEST POSTS    |   MY THREADS  
 
GENERAL DISCUSSIONS MESSAGE BOARD
 
   
SEARCH BOARDS:  
SEARCH THIS BOARD ONLY  
SEARCH HEADERS ONLY  
 
           
   Page 1 of 2     First Page     Previous Page     Next Page     Last Page  New Topic New Topic    New Poll New Poll    Post Reply Post Reply    Help Help   
 
 MESSAGE BOARDS >> GENERAL DISCUSSIONS
 POLL: Military Option On The Table  
 
 
 
 Do you agree with Military Option ?
 by Evanscense
 Yes
 No
 I think this is something between Israel and Iran
 I don't care
 
   


Current rank: 4.5 Stars. Next Rank at 20.000 Posts.

Send a PM to Evanscense
EVIL GENIUS
Evanscense
  send PM
  view profile
  add to friends
  
User #: 829177
Posts: 12127 
Joined: Oct 16, 2009   
Last visit: Nov 18, 2014
Posted: Mar 19, 2012 8:23:57 AM - Report post  (0)  (0)       Post Reply  post reply  

If you ensure that Iran 100% accesses nuclear weapons, Do you agree with a Military attack ?! Why ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Clint Eastwood: "Seems like whenever I get to liking someone, they ain't around for long." Chief Dan George: "I notice when you get to disliking someone, they ain't around for long neither."
Current rank: 1.5 Stars. Next Rank at 500 Posts.

Send a PM to Foxxie-kun
VETERAN
Foxxie-kun
  send PM
  view profile
  add to friends

United States 
User #: 648165
Posts: 443 
Joined: Feb 18, 2009   
Last visit: Nov 26, 2014
Posted: Mar 19, 2012 8:39:04 AM - Report post  (3)  (0)       Post Reply  post reply  

A theocracy armed with the most destructive weapons to ever exist is far more dangerous than most people give it credit for. Be it a Christian, Muslim, or Jewish theocracy, a nation run solely by a religion and not a secular nation with enough checks and balances to ensure responsibility lends itself to some very bad situations with no possibility of a peaceful outcome.

I believe responsible nations like the U.K. and certain few others must have some nuclear arms simply to embody a sense of M.A.D. (Mutually Assured Destruction) among other nations with Nuclear arms, but when a nation is ruled by the belief that the deaths of oneself in the act of cleansing "heathens" M.A.D. becomes worthless, as they'd believe their God would allow them into heaven at their death for their "holy sacrifice".

So in short, I believe Iran and other theocracies MUST be prevented from a rise to nuclear power by any means necessary. If that means unsavory methods, then the ends (preventing possible worldwide nuclear war and destruction) justify any means taken to those ends.

That's just my take on the dangers of theocracies armed with nukes, though.

*edit*

To further clarify, I think allowing the Iranian government to gain nuclear weapons is just as dangerous for the average Iran citizen as it is for the citizens of nations Iran's government has a vested interest in attacking. If Iran would provoke or attack the wrong people, it could spell a not-so-gentle wave of hate for not only Iran (Be they government affiliate or citizen) but also every person who doesn't hail from Israel in the middle-east, and possibly a massive fallout on the entire Islam religion. I don't like the idea of innocents not affiliated or in support of their government being harmed because some can't see the difference between two radicals and moderates of a religion and simply lump them together because they have the same god.

I definitely don't want to see innocents harmed in any capacity, but with nuclear weapons there's no way to avoid massive non-combatant casualties. Nagasaki and Hiroshima were cities where civilians lived, with a minor military presence at best, and when the Fat Man and Little Boy were dropped, all manner of innocent people died. Police, children, elderly, women, men, people simply working or living their lives in peace, all snuffed out in the flash of splitting atoms. I don't ever want to see Nuclear weapons used against any nation, my own or any other, and I don't want political fallout to cause deaths just as the literal fallout would.

Political sanctions, trade embargoes, censure by the United Nations, and any other non-military methods are preferable, but if the Iranian government insists it wants to pursue acquiring nuclear weapons, then they've left no other choice but military intervention to prevent massive death and destruction on a global scale.

[Edited by Foxxie-kun, 3/19/2012 2:01:15 PM]

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yo.
Current rank: 1.5 Stars. Next Rank at 500 Posts.

Send a PM to Mirraluka
VETERAN
Mirraluka
  send PM
  view profile
  add to friends

United Kingdom 
User #: 1064833
Posts: 418 
Joined: Oct 22, 2010   
Last visit: Nov 25, 2014
Posted: Mar 21, 2012 1:28:13 AM - Report post  (1)  (0)       Post Reply  post reply  

Do you agree with a Military attack ?! Why ?

Evanscense, the poll SAY'S IT ALL, sorry about the capitals,the Iranian leaders are Nutcases!!! Bomb,Bomb,Bomb,thats enough said.
Sorry too all our Iranian friends on CHU but we have to decide.

[Edited by Mirraluka, 3/21/2012 1:30:05 AM]

Current rank: 4.5 Stars. Next Rank at 20.000 Posts.

Send a PM to Evanscense
EVIL GENIUS
Evanscense
  send PM
  view profile
  add to friends
  
User #: 829177
Posts: 12127 
Joined: Oct 16, 2009   
Last visit: Nov 18, 2014
Posted: Mar 21, 2012 1:54:08 AM - Report post  (0)  (0)       Post Reply  post reply  

I know why people around the world and specially Israel are worried. Because Iranian Leader is an insane and takes nothing but nonsense and it boosting the conflict through the region.

I give the right to the Israelis, When the Iran President comes and declares Israel should be removed of the world map def that's really alarming and shows how the regime is incompetent and dangerous.

Every nation is free to have nuclear programs, But they should do deserve.

[Edited by Evanscense, 3/21/2012 1:55:23 AM]

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Clint Eastwood: "Seems like whenever I get to liking someone, they ain't around for long." Chief Dan George: "I notice when you get to disliking someone, they ain't around for long neither."
Current rank: 4.5 Stars. Next Rank at 20.000 Posts.

Send a PM to Evanscense
EVIL GENIUS
Evanscense
  send PM
  view profile
  add to friends
  
User #: 829177
Posts: 12127 
Joined: Oct 16, 2009   
Last visit: Nov 18, 2014
Posted: Mar 21, 2012 2:05:13 AM - Report post  (0)  (0)       Post Reply  post reply  

I'm myself against a war 100%, But the idiot regime gives no proper answer to the diplomatic ways, And it makes the situation 100 times harder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Clint Eastwood: "Seems like whenever I get to liking someone, they ain't around for long." Chief Dan George: "I notice when you get to disliking someone, they ain't around for long neither."
Current rank: 1.5 Stars. Next Rank at 500 Posts.

Send a PM to Mirraluka
VETERAN
Mirraluka
  send PM
  view profile
  add to friends

United Kingdom 
User #: 1064833
Posts: 418 
Joined: Oct 22, 2010   
Last visit: Nov 25, 2014
Posted: Mar 21, 2012 8:37:37 AM - Report post  (0)  (0)       Post Reply  post reply  

 quote:
 originally posted by Evanscense:

I'm myself against a war 100%, But the idiot regime gives no proper answer to the diplomatic ways, And it makes the situation 100 times harder.

As an Ex Soldier so am i Evanesense war is no good,But needed at certain times,and what you have said is 100% correct,IRAN will, not co-operate with Diplomacy full stop.

When IRAN openly says it wants to wipe Israel from the face of the earth something is wrong in their teachings,for me personally we have been talking far too long and its time for the real ACTION and we will have to accept the consequences,rather that today than a NUKE on Israel in 2 years time,like i said before Bomb,Bomb,Bomb,nuff said.

Current rank: 4.5 Stars. Next Rank at 20.000 Posts.

Send a PM to Shibby
ELITE
Shibby
  send PM
  view profile
  add to friends

New Zealand 
User #: 35955
Posts: 12795 
Joined: Dec 29, 2004   
Last visit: Oct 27, 2014
Posted: Mar 22, 2012 12:54:38 AM - Report post  (2)  (0)       Post Reply  post reply  

I think there are better ways than war to resolve this conflict.

I also think it's very hypocritical when some of the nations opposing Iran have nuclear weapons themselves.

Do a deal with them - They stop their nuclear program, and everyone else do the same and dismantle their weapons.

Yea, I am dreaming... but its nice to imagine the world with common sense.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shibby __/--

Current rank: 2 Stars. Next Rank at 1000 Posts.

Send a PM to Shotgunmaniac
CHEATMASTER
Shotgunmaniac
  send PM
  view profile
  add to friends

United States 
User #: 162293
Posts: 665 
Joined: Sep 18, 2006   
Last visit: Nov 24, 2014
Posted: Mar 22, 2012 1:42:13 AM - Report post  (0)  (0)       Post Reply  post reply  

 quote:
 originally posted by Shibby:

I think there are better ways than war to resolve this conflict.

I also think it's very hypocritical when some of the nations opposing Iran have nuclear weapons themselves.

Do a deal with them - They stop their nuclear program, and everyone else do the same and dismantle their weapons.

Yea, I am dreaming... but its nice to imagine the world with common sense.

Agreed, at least on the "take a third option" bit, though for differing reasons.

Pragmatically, a ground war will cripple every power involved. Resource-wise, eh. Just about every first-world power can put a MOAB down an air vent and minimize collateral. Blowing a place to Hell and back will not detonate any nuclear threats they may actually already have, but...

It's a war that would tear everyone who went in for cleanup into broken shells of men. We're talking about people that have a few million children in their militia. Their militia that focuses on religious policing and enticing said kids to join with a delicacy-a-night as payment for "services" rendered.

God forbid a nuclear containment site actually get hit in a way that lets it seep into the surrounding area. I have a hunch they'd defend the spill iteslf just for the "the invaders are war criminals" angle they could play to their own people.

Great, trying to think of a reasonable solution gave me a Heinlein: "Violence, naked force, has settled more issues in history than has any other factor, and the contrary opinion is wishful thinking at its worst. Breeds that forget this basic truth have always paid for it with their lives and freedoms."

I do fail to see how universal disarmament would do a lick of good, however. I mean, think about it for a bit. If that big, Hulk-y hadn't shown up at the sandbox and stolen your pail when you were a kid, would you have stopped digging willingly? Or would you be admiring the Great Wall in person right now?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
22/M/Texas - Proud Brony!
Page 1 of 2     First Page     Previous Page     Next Page     Last Page
Go to page: 2 
All times are (GMT -08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada). Current time is 2:52:01 PM
Return to General Discussions Message Board 4629 users online.   4462 guests / 167 members.
 
     
 
 
Trainer Troubleshooting Guide        Cheat Terms and Tutorials        Anti-Virus Notifications        Site Help / FAQ        Submit Cheats        Our Friends and Affiliates        About Us
      Copyright © 2001 - 2014  webworks, LLC  All Rights Reserved    -   DISCLAIMER    -   PRIVACY POLICY    -   TERMS OF SERVICE