LOGIN  .  SIGNUP   .  SUPPORT 
HOME / MESSAGE BOARDS / GENERAL DISCUSSIONS

General Discussions

Signup   Message Boards Home   Newest Posts   My Favorite Boards   My Threads
Page 4 of 5   •  First Page  •  Previous Page  •   Next Page  •   Last Page
Signup or Login to Post
New vs. Old
 
Elite  posted on Jan 15, 2011 1:38:58 PM - Report post

Current rank: 3.5 Stars. Next Rank at 8000 Posts.
Send a message to Elite
ELITE
quote:
originally posted by Petray

GTA: San Andreas.

This is all I need to say.

Which can't be defined as particularly old or new.

 
RageaholicRick  posted on Jan 15, 2011 1:51:05 PM - Report post

Current rank: 3.5 Stars. Next Rank at 8000 Posts.
Send a message to RageaholicRick
ELITE
I think San Andreas is more of a "Recent" game than an old or a new game.
 
latios_power  posted on Jan 15, 2011 3:29:15 PM - Report post

Current rank: 3.5 Stars. Next Rank at 8000 Posts.
Send a message to latios_power
ELITE
I consider GTA: SA/VC/III new games no doubt.
 
QueenNic  posted on Jan 17, 2011 1:35:02 PM - Report post

Current rank: 3 Stars. Next Rank at 4000 Posts.
Send a message to QueenNic
V.I.P.
quote:
originally posted by latios_power

I consider GTA: SA/VC/III new games no doubt.

They're not that recent.

Hell, Final Fantasy X is knocking on to a decade old now. Vice City and III weren't released that much later. Face it, they're old now.

 
latios_power  posted on Jan 17, 2011 2:05:43 PM - Report post

Current rank: 3.5 Stars. Next Rank at 8000 Posts.
Send a message to latios_power
ELITE
quote:
originally posted by Nic_Durron

quote:
originally posted by latios_power

I consider GTA: SA/VC/III new games no doubt.

They're not that recent.

Hell, Final Fantasy X is knocking on to a decade old now. Vice City and III weren't released that much later. Face it, they're old now.

Anything after 2000 is new to me. Play GTA 2 then play the ones after it and you will see the reason why I call them "new".

But that's just me.

 
QueenNic  posted on Jan 17, 2011 2:15:45 PM - Report post

Current rank: 3 Stars. Next Rank at 4000 Posts.
Send a message to QueenNic
V.I.P.
quote:
originally posted by latios_power

quote:
originally posted by Nic_Durron

quote:
originally posted by latios_power

I consider GTA: SA/VC/III new games no doubt.

They're not that recent.

Hell, Final Fantasy X is knocking on to a decade old now. Vice City and III weren't released that much later. Face it, they're old now.

Anything after 2000 is new to me. Play GTA 2 then play the ones after it and you will see the reason why I call them "new".

But that's just me.

It's 2011.

Anything pre-2005 is old.

 
planbskater  posted on Jan 17, 2011 3:38:14 PM - Report post

Current rank: 3 Stars. Next Rank at 4000 Posts.
Send a message to planbskater
ELITE
quote:
originally posted by Nic_Durron

quote:
originally posted by latios_power

quote:
originally posted by Nic_Durron

quote:
originally posted by latios_power

I consider GTA: SA/VC/III new games no doubt.

They're not that recent.

Hell, Final Fantasy X is knocking on to a decade old now. Vice City and III weren't released that much later. Face it, they're old now.

Anything after 2000 is new to me. Play GTA 2 then play the ones after it and you will see the reason why I call them "new".

But that's just me.

It's 2011.

Anything pre-2005 is old.

Eh. Borderline old. Ps1 is old.

 
Shibby  posted on Jan 17, 2011 5:38:31 PM - Report post

Current rank: 4.5 Stars. Next Rank at 20.000 Posts.
Send a message to Shibby
ELITE
We all define old and new differently depending on our own gaming experiences. I think anything pre-2000 is old because I had racked up quite a few years gaming in the 90's but those who were starting gaming in the 2000's will think that anything pre-2005 -for example- is old.

Page 4 of 5   •  First Page  •  Previous Page  •   Next Page  •   Last Page
  Post Reply
Go to page: 1  2  3  4  5 
All times are (GMT -06:00) Central Time (US & Canada). Current time is 5:39:26 PM