Neither. Both are young adult lowbrow crap.
Dhampy, come on, everyone knows realistically portrayed dragons kick the ever loving balls off of Edward Cullen and his merry band of fairies and ho girlfriend who'd cheat on him with a wolf (I smell rule 34/46!).
I worship the ground Paolini walks on, whereas the ground that ho that wrote Twilight is forever plagued by a -20 Intelligence panel for all eternity.
I can't wait for the final book in the Inheritance cycle.
"realistically portrayed dragons"
Your opinion on this matter is now invalid.
Twilight is pretty bad, but the other option isn't anything special. I never liked how the first book's title is just "Dragon" but with one letter changed.
Picky much?
... Eragorn has sequels?
I did not know this...
Eragon was bad. But not unbearable bad like Twilight. Just bad.
Activating fanboy rage: Initiating bombardment.
RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGE!
*slaps Malyg 10,000 times a second until his face melts off from the friction*