LOGIN  .  SIGNUP   .  REWARDS   .  SUPPORT 
/ / / / DON'T FIND ANY NUKES!

World in Conflict Discussion

World in Conflict Trainer

Message Board for PC version

Signup   Message Boards Home   Newest Posts   My Favorite Boards   My Threads
Page 3 of 3   •  First Page  •  Previous Page  •   Next Page  •   Last Page
Signup or Login to Post
Don't find any NUKES!
 
komrade  posted on Oct 16, 2007 4:06:26 AM - Report post

Current rank: 1 Star. Next Rank at 100 Posts.
Send a message to komrade
ELITE
the expansion (its inevitable) will probably have a soviet campaign.
there are way too many poeple that asked for it on their forums to ignore.
Sierra and massive have solid gold in their hands and they know it.
 
wil101  posted on Oct 19, 2007 4:10:40 PM - Report post

Current rank: 1 Star. Next Rank at 100 Posts.
Send a message to wil101
ELITE
quote:
originally posted by Flashpiont

the usage of tactical nuclear weapons in the game anyway is a little extreme for the late cold war. especially the use of one on seattle just to stop the chinese. conventional airstrikes would have done the job just as well anyway since air superiority isnt an issue in the game for the US. plus three carpet bombings will do just as much damage w/o radioactive fallout. and a tactical nuke is a lot more powerful than the ones in the game, a modern tactical nuke is about as powerful as hiroshima. a stratigic nuke is about 200x as powerful. the russian tsar bomba would vaporize most of NYC

I'm not sure if you meant that they were going to use a tactical or strategic nuke on Seattle. It was going to be a Strategic nuke which would wipe out the Chinese, the Russians, and the stragglers of the Americans(because it would be launched if the attack failed). That nuke would level Seattle and most of the countryside. And again, If this were real war, as is portrayed in all the cut-scenes and mini-videos, both sides would have difficulty with Air Superiority, meaning that sneaking in any number of bombers would be both difficult and almost certainly fatal for the crews. A strategic Nuke would be an assured hit and would wipe out all of the enemy forces, instead of the few that a bomber strike could possibly get to.

 
toluno  posted on Oct 25, 2007 6:49:19 PM - Report post

Current rank: 1 Star. Next Rank at 100 Posts.
Send a message to toluno
ELITE
is there a skirmish mode in the full version of the game
 
superweapons  posted on Oct 26, 2007 7:07:15 AM - Report post

Current rank: 2.5 Stars. Next Rank at 2000 Posts.
Send a message to superweapons
ELITE
Yes, go to the multiplayer section and look for the tab "create server". Then choose "custom game" and do whatever you want to. They should have made it easier to navigate the main menu.
 
Flashpiont  posted on Nov 05, 2007 12:33:36 AM - Report post

Current rank: 1 Star. Next Rank at 100 Posts.
Send a message to Flashpiont
ELITE
quote:
originally posted by wil101

quote:
originally posted by Flashpiont

the usage of tactical nuclear weapons in the game anyway is a little extreme for the late cold war. especially the use of one on seattle just to stop the chinese. conventional airstrikes would have done the job just as well anyway since air superiority isnt an issue in the game for the US. plus three carpet bombings will do just as much damage w/o radioactive fallout. and a tactical nuke is a lot more powerful than the ones in the game, a modern tactical nuke is about as powerful as hiroshima. a stratigic nuke is about 200x as powerful. the russian tsar bomba would vaporize most of NYC

I'm not sure if you meant that they were going to use a tactical or strategic nuke on Seattle. It was going to be a Strategic nuke which would wipe out the Chinese, the Russians, and the stragglers of the Americans(because it would be launched if the attack failed). That nuke would level Seattle and most of the countryside. And again, If this were real war, as is portrayed in all the cut-scenes and mini-videos, both sides would have difficulty with Air Superiority, meaning that sneaking in any number of bombers would be both difficult and almost certainly fatal for the crews. A strategic Nuke would be an assured hit and would wipe out all of the enemy forces, instead of the few that a bomber strike could possibly get to.

i meant that, if it were a real war, that the use of a nuclear weapon just to remove the chinese and russians from our soil is a little extreme. divisions would have been pulled from europe to defend our own country, and we could have done that in a few days. i think that, well GW. Bush, would have resorted to that over dropping a nuke on seattle. i also doubt that the russians would have had the manpower after months of war in europe to even launch an invasion and occupation of a city like seattle. u think were havin a hard time in baghdad, seattle is a little larger, and civilians own guns.

Page 3 of 3   •  First Page  •  Previous Page  •   Next Page  •   Last Page
  Post Reply
Go to page: 1  2  3 
All times are (GMT -06:00) Central Time (US & Canada). Current time is 12:42:11 PM
Cheat Happens Premium
 
* Access PC trainers and exclusive content
* Updated game trainers and cheats daily
* Get notified when new cheats are added
* Request which games get new trainers
* Priority support with any problem
Latest Trainer
World in Conflict Trainer
• Get 50000 Resource Points
• Get 1000 Tactical Points
• Instant Tactical
+ 6 more options
  Show all Cheats & Trainers
Latest Wallpaper
1024 x 768
1152 x 600
1280 x 960
1280 x 1024
1600 x 1200
• 1920 x 1200
Wallpaper #1 of 1   Show All