General Discussions

no plans to remove the +50 posts award.

Very nice feature i must say and the 50+ is good you see , not bad well ..... if it was like 100+ it would be GREAT ! but 50 is good , and sure i will give it a try . guys each day you make CH a better place YOU ARE ROCKING !!!!

[Edited by IbrahimX999, 4/18/2011 1:11:52 PM]

Okay, let's look at your game collection. Let's say you have ~20 games over the years. Maybe 6 or so recently played. Those 6 can net you 300 posts as long as your reviews are decent. If you re-play some of your older games, not only could you get more posts, you can remember the reason you bought that game - it's fun. Twenty games nets you 1000 posts. If you have an even more extensive library of games, it's thousands of posts.

This may be a first, but I must agree with 42. 50 post is very generous, helping other gamers is what this cite is built around, is there really a need for a perk? I'm not saying to remove the 50 post perk, merely saying that its more then sufficient.

So far the general use of the review system has been abused.

People asking about why the trainer isn't working with their games.
People giving cheats.
A couple asking for a trainer lol
Some just had absolute nonsense.

For the giving cheats I can understand how they got a bit confused on where to submit them. But the others is no excuse, wish I could take 50 posts away from them for just wasting time lol

NOTICE -- We have increased the post count reward to *200* for those that submit user reviews that are posted on the site.

I have wanted this feature for awhile. I am definitely going to use this feature as much as possible. Thanks you guys, keep up the fantastic work!

200 posts ?! sounds so tempting... Maybe one day I'd write some when I had fewer works on my slate.