Assassin´s Creed: Brotherhood Discussion
So, if that's the case, no ACB 2 or 3. Just AC3.
Knowing Ubisoft, getting more and more like EA with every release, will draw the franchise out as long as they possibly can (like Halo), which means probably a couple more intermediary games either between or after AC3. Which isn't necessarily a bad thing for us.... just our wallets.
[Edited by sharp911, 3/27/2011 10:54:57 AM]
Really? I mean, Brotherhood is amazing and i would gladly enjoy a ACB2, but i think it would be cooler if the next AC abandonded Ezio and went on to a new era.
Because in the end the whole series is NOT about Ezio, but the fight between the Templars and the Assassins over these powerful artifacts and how this fight goes on.
Because of that concept i highly doubt that any next AC will play in a time before Ezio or even Altair.
I like crsojos idea of helping start the French Revolution, but it doesn't have to be necessarily a time of big change, since the Templar-Assassin-fight takes stage behind the scenes anyway.
I personally would prefer that the next AC plays sometime around 1800/1850 and the last in Desmonds time, where i'm interested in how Ubisoft will then solve the climbing-jumping-thingy, cause jumping from the rooftops of New York...i don't know ^^
* Updated game trainers and cheats daily
* Get notified when new cheats are added
* Request which games get new trainers
* Priority support with any problem