No different from other modern RTS's either, sadly. Starcraft 2, Red Alert 3 and C&C4 are just some examples of total ruination of a game. Starcraft 2 will make it good just because of its classical (SC1-esque) gameplay, but there's no reason to get RA3 or C&C4 whatsoever.
The graphics, the gameplay and the overall feeling of the game(s) has been made into a childish mess. (Also known as the "console disease", the games are so simple they could be played on a NES controller if so were.)
In my opinion RA3 "leads" by a long way, EA totally screwed up the Red Alert franchise, pretty much as bad as they could, with RA3. Supcom2 is (at least judging by the demo) still a decent RTS, and it keeps some good things from the first, even if many are lost and missed. (Good to get rid of the dumb fuel system for air units though - it was totally illogical.)
the fuel system for air units was "illogical" ? wtf did you really just say that? whatever im gonna let it slide
However this is a great example of the console tards ruining PC gaming and its only going to get worse and worse and horribly effin worse... nothing we can do about though
And i dont understand why they want to move the RTS genre to consoles anyways.. i dont care what the biggest, most hardcore console fanboy says an RTS will never play good on consoles.. why are they pushing it so hard?
i really just want to cry just thinking of whats happening to the PC gaming world.. but at least PC gaming has dedicated modders who can change almost anything on a PC game.. espically the cartooney graphics on SupCom 2.
Graphics on the game have been compromised, for profits and console gaming
i dont understand this comment, the graphics are the same style as the first one, just with extra effects. So what are you comparing this too?