It is folly to embrace stagnation. Humanity cannot advance if it does not risk.
There's a difference between risk and suicide.
It is folly to embrace stagnation. Humanity cannot advance if it does not risk.
There's a difference between risk and suicide.
You cannot prove it would be suicide anymore than I can prove it wouldn't. It is entirely possible to maintain an equilibrium in population, thereby achieving a true evolutionary response over time.
No.
You are just a murderer
To think you'll become the best by simply killing the rest
You just become a mass murderer
The next target of people who wish to get rid of you.
Power and status that is destroyed at the instant by teamwork.
That's all that will result of it.
By law, killing under law cannot be murder. Soldiers don't murder enemy soldiers. Police don't murder gangbangers.
By definition, killing for self-defense cannot be murder. Murder is pre-mediated. Self-defense is a momentary response.
Killing with the intend of the phrase "Survival of the Fittest" comes under terms of murder. Those who do not seek to be the Fittest will not commit murder, they will live their lives to the best of their ability.
No.
You are just a murderer
To think you'll become the best by simply killing the rest
You just become a mass murderer
The next target of people who wish to get rid of you.
Power and status that is destroyed at the instant by teamwork.
That's all that will result of it.
By law, killing under law cannot be murder. Soldiers don't murder enemy soldiers. Police don't murder gangbangers.
By definition, killing for self-defense cannot be murder. Murder is pre-mediated. Self-defense is a momentary response.
Killing with the intend of the phrase "Survival of the Fittest" comes under terms of murder. Those who do not seek to be the Fittest will not commit murder, they will live their lives to the best of their ability.
If it is under law, it cannot be murder regardless of ethical objections.
Murder is a legal distinction between forms of killing, nothing more.
No.
You are just a murderer
To think you'll become the best by simply killing the rest
You just become a mass murderer
The next target of people who wish to get rid of you.
Power and status that is destroyed at the instant by teamwork.
That's all that will result of it.
By law, killing under law cannot be murder. Soldiers don't murder enemy soldiers. Police don't murder gangbangers.
By definition, killing for self-defense cannot be murder. Murder is pre-mediated. Self-defense is a momentary response.
Killing with the intend of the phrase "Survival of the Fittest" comes under terms of murder. Those who do not seek to be the Fittest will not commit murder, they will live their lives to the best of their ability.
If it is under law, it cannot be murder regardless of ethical objections.
Murder is a legal distinction between forms of killing, nothing more.
You are debating for murder.
Making killing legal will negate your own debate.
No.
You are just a murderer
To think you'll become the best by simply killing the rest
You just become a mass murderer
The next target of people who wish to get rid of you.
Power and status that is destroyed at the instant by teamwork.
That's all that will result of it.
By law, killing under law cannot be murder. Soldiers don't murder enemy soldiers. Police don't murder gangbangers.
By definition, killing for self-defense cannot be murder. Murder is pre-mediated. Self-defense is a momentary response.
Killing with the intend of the phrase "Survival of the Fittest" comes under terms of murder. Those who do not seek to be the Fittest will not commit murder, they will live their lives to the best of their ability.
If it is under law, it cannot be murder regardless of ethical objections.
Murder is a legal distinction between forms of killing, nothing more.
You are debating for murder.
Making killing legal will negate your own debate.
I don't consider that a hindrance.
Important Board Topics
Trending Topics