That's some more good feedback.
Remember, this is our first trial of this new protection scheme. We knew there would be some that have concerns over it. This does not mean that this new scheme is written in stone or that we won't continue to evolve it based on our member feedback. I would like to ask of those that seem to be extremely opposed to it -- what is causing the concern? Is it merely the fact that it's there? Is it that much of a hassle to be connected to the Internet when using it? Are you concerned over privacy? I know that some people think that any and all anti-piracy protection methods are evil, regardless of whether or not they actually inconvenience the user, I'm just trying to get a better understanding of where our members stand. We've tried to make the process as simple and non-disruptive as possible. No information is sent to or collected by us during the process, it's merely a simple check.
I understand it's merely a simple check. My personal views are;
1) 'Required' internet connection. What if i'm taking the game and trainer with me on a laptop away somewhere for a few days? I can't use the trainer then? So what did i pay for?...
2) The fact it's totally, utterly, unworkably moot. There is not a single protection in existance that cannot be cracked if people seriously want to crack it. By doing this, you're making yourselves MORE of a target. There will be those out there who will go out of their way to break your protections JUST COZ, even if they don't give a crap for the trainer's content itself, they'll do it just to flip you the finger or
3) It's a horrible precedent. This is arguably a first for a TRAINER. Never before have i ever seen a trainer that has an online check... If you're willing to do this NOW, what WON'T you be willing to do in future? Can we truly trust your words that 'it's simply an online check'? That may be the case NOW, but what about LATER?
4) Principle. You're pulling a Sony, or Steam, or (insert online verification DRM here). You are not
These are simply my personal views. I appreciate the hard work all the staff here at CH put in on their trainers, which is why i became a paying member. However i did not become a paying member to endorse this sort of DRM, and if this is the way things are going to go, i may start regretting my membership... I'm sure i'm probably not the only one that feels this way too.
Please rethink it. You can try whatever other method you want, but be aware of where the lines are drawn in the sand. The large corporations FREQUENTLY cross these lines in the name of 'protection of intellectual property' and step on their users toes. As a result, we continue to see civil disobedience through apathy. A good analogy is a farmer with a lot of cows that are just wandering away as they don't care to be herded anymore. He can go after his cows with a stick, whack a few and get them back on the straight and narrow, or he can take after them with a shotgun. The first leaves him with 1% of his herd and the latter leaves him with nothing.
This is what is happening, right here right now, in the gaming industry in general. The media companies have been stepping on the feet of their customers and suing them left, right and center. But the herd continues to wander away.
[Edited by Shirakani, 4/9/2008 6:18:59 AM]