luck rulz but the bugs ppl are talking about is actually a crappy optimization
u may not notice it if u have a strong rig, tho
and minor gfx artifacts on ATi cards and on vista
i sincerely hope they'll improve everything. but as far as ive read form the reviews its the same collection of advantages and disatvantages that the original stalker was. but i think ill still try out their new ecosystem and gfx effects. ïîïûòêà íå ïûòêà êðîìå êàê $ óáûâàþò
My PC is not HiEnd, but not crappy too ))
amd x2 6000+, 4Gb RAM, RAID 0 2x500Gb Seagate Barracuda 16 Mb, 8800 GT 512 Mb. Win XP HE. The game runs smoothly.
Áîëüøå è íå íóæíî íà äàííûé ìîìåíò ñåé÷àñ.
not crappy at all, its a steady midend if u ask me, i got 2 gigs of ram and a 8600 now THATS crap.
as for the game well i understand u dont have problems u got an xp and an nvidia card...
can u plz tell me is it really more demandful to hardware? i mean i could play shadow of chernobyl in high resolution only on medium settings, will i need to kick down the res on clear sky?
[Edited by pop33, 8/26/2008 1:38:45 PM]
â îáùåì, íàïèøó ïî-ðóññêè. íàäåþñü, äÿäüêè àäìèíû ðóãàòüñÿ íå áóäóò. òîðìîçà íà âûñîêèõ ðàçðåøåíèÿõ ïðîèñõîäÿò èç-çà íåäîñòàòî÷íîãî êîë-âà ïàìÿòè íà áîðòó ó âèäþõè. òàê, äëÿ êîððåêòíîé ðàáîòû èãð â ðàçðåøåíèè 1280*1024 è âûøå ñ âêëþ÷åííûì àíòèàëàéçèíãîì, íóæíî íå ìåíåå 512 Ìá âèäåî ïàìÿòè.
in a few words - english version. for a smooth run u need at least 512 mb of video memory at high resolutions when anti alising is "on"
[Edited by kotoffsky, 8/27/2008 11:32:44 AM]
47 ñòðàíèö? áàãîâ? jeez, i guess i really have to wait for the english version and a dozen patches :|
damn it, guys. I see no bugs AT ALL!
not crappy at all, its a steady midend if u ask me, i got 2 gigs of ram and a 8600 now THATS crap.
as for the game well i understand u dont have problems u got an xp and an nvidia card...
can u plz tell me is it really more demandful to hardware? i mean i could play shadow of chernobyl in high resolution only on medium settings, will i need to kick down the res on clear sky?
[Edited by pop33, 8/26/2008 1:38:45 PM]
â îáùåì, íàïèøó ïî-ðóññêè. íàäåþñü, äÿäüêè àäìèíû ðóãàòüñÿ íå áóäóò. òîðìîçà íà âûñîêèõ ðàçðåøåíèÿõ ïðîèñõîäÿò èç-çà íåäîñòàòî÷íîãî êîë-âà ïàìÿòè íà áîðòó ó âèäþõè. òàê, äëÿ êîððåêòíîé ðàáîòû èãð â ðàçðåøåíèè 1280*1024 è âûøå ñ âêëþ÷åííûì àíòèàëàéçèíãîì, íóæíî íå ìåíåå 512 Ìá âèäåî ïàìÿòè.
in a few words - english version. for a smooth run u need at least 512 mb of video memory at high resolutions when anti alising is "on"
[Edited by kotoffsky, 8/27/2008 11:32:44 AM]
ó ìíÿ 512 âèäåî ÍÎ âñå òàêè ýòî 8600 à íå õàéåíä êàêîé-òî, ÿ âîîáøå âûøå 1024 768 è íå ñìåþ ñòàâèòü. à àëèàçèíã - ìå÷òàòü íå âðåäíî...
ïðî áàãîâ îõîòíî âåðþ, äîæäóñü ENG âåðñèè è îáÿçàòåëüíî êóïëþ
and anyway i think this bug discussion is pointless. we'll all need to try the game ourselves. the bugs seem minor cuz there you go, some ppl dont even have them.
Important Board Topics
Trending Topics