General Discussions

Page 5 of 5   •  First Page  •  Previous Page  •   Next Page  •   Last Page
Signup or Login to Post
Steam Early release and alpha/Beta games
  • Tier 7
    Send a message to wingers17
    TIER 7
    wingers17 posted on Mar 29, 2014 3:39:08 PM - Report post
     
    I, for one, love Early Access games. I also love trainers, i think that trainers for Early Access miss the point of the program, trainers could make it hard to find bugs.

    I think once a month would be fair for updates. It's not that big of deal to have to wait a little bit.
  • Premium Plus
    Send a message to B4Marc
    BLANDUS COR
    B4Marc posted on Mar 29, 2014 3:45:30 PM - Report post
     
    Being a 24/7 pc gamer (like "Oliver" in SG2), I think the once a week re-patch of trainers is a good deal, all depending on your "new games" workload
    Freedom is doing what we enjoy, happiness is enjoying what we do.

    La liberté c'est faire ce que l'on aime, le bonheur c'est aimer ce que l'on fait.


    Happy pc gamer
    Joyeux pc luron
  • Current rank: 1.5 Stars. Next Rank at 500 Posts.
    Send a message to dodge444
    ELITE
    dodge444 posted on Mar 30, 2014 4:27:30 PM - Report post
     
    I'm not a fan of asking gamers to pay for a game that isn't ready for release. I know it's expensive to release a new title and hope it catches on but really, it costs millions to make a movie, too, but you don't see studios asking audiences to shell out for an unfinished film, do you? Personally, I'd like to see this trend die, and making trainers over and over for a game under repair is just helping this kind of marketing stay around.

  • Current rank: 1.5 Stars. Next Rank at 500 Posts.
    Send a message to dodge444
    ELITE
    dodge444 posted on Mar 30, 2014 4:33:12 PM - Report post
     
    quote:
    originally posted by Toki

    Since am majorly against Early access. I still stand by my statement I have said in the past. We should not touch them. Reasons behind this.

    1. Gamers allowing companies to not bother testing the product themselfs, making the gamer pay to basicly do the testing for them. Which brings more incomplete games.

    2. Countless patches, which can be nearly two a day.

    3. More pressure to keep trainers updated.

    4. Aggressivness against trainer makers.

    I could probably go on. But this subject is a serious one.

    Basicly I say dont touch them, less presure, Less complaints due to countless updates, less time taken away to work on other games.

    Yeah it will tick folk off but you the gamer needs to stop touching early access. So these compines actully test their own work properly!

    Totally agree, Toki

Page 5 of 5   •  First Page  •  Previous Page  •   Next Page  •   Last Page
Signup or Login to Post
All times are (GMT -06:00) Central Time (US & Canada). Current time is 9:03:24 AM