Assassin´s Creed: Revelations Message Board  STATUS: ACTIVE - Trainers are still being considered and updated for this title as patches are released. There is no guarantee that a trainer can be made or updated but it will be reviewed by our staff.

Our Assassin´s Creed: Revelations Trainer is now available for version 1.03 and supports STEAM. Our Assassin´s Creed: Revelations message board is available to provide feedback on our trainers or cheats.
Assassin´s Creed: Revelations Trainer
REQUEST MORE OPTIONS
0 option(s) for voting
FILE UPDATE REQUEST
0 report(s) filed
BOOST UPDATE PRIORITY
Boost currently not available
Message Board for PC version
Page 3 of 6   •  First Page  •  Previous Page  •   Next Page  •   Last Page
Signup or Login to Post
Did we get shafted with ACR ???
  • Current rank: 2 Stars. Next Rank at 1000 Posts.
    Send a message to CJ
    ELITE
    CJ posted on Dec 04, 2011 7:59:36 AM - Report post
     
    Personally i was disappointed with AC..

    i had gotten the original on sale last year i think it was..

    Graphics looked nice, seemed to be my kind of game and then BAM!!!! i play it and turns out the games based in dream land or some crap.

    wasnt to thrilled with that..

    shrug
  • Tier 7
    Send a message to madatcheats
    TIER 7
    madatcheats posted on Dec 04, 2011 8:12:22 AM - Report post
     
    In my opinion they somehow missed to establish a feeling for the great city of Istambul. They managed to do it for Venice, Florenz, and Rome. This time it's just plain boring. Very little history, very little cultural references, and why the hell do you never see these great buildings from the inside?
    Better to reign in hell, than to serve in heaven.
  • Current rank: 2 Stars. Next Rank at 1000 Posts.
    Send a message to CJ
    ELITE
    CJ posted on Dec 04, 2011 8:58:45 AM - Report post
     
    For them to look accurate on the Inside they would need permission to reproduce it in the game.

    Whether it be pictures, or the Devs actually going there.

    [Edited by DigitalIP, 12/4/2011 8:59:03 AM]
  • Current rank: 1 Star. Next Rank at 100 Posts.
    Send a message to FlexRe
    ELITE
    FlexRe posted on Dec 04, 2011 2:32:04 PM - Report post
     
    quote:
    originally posted by DigitalIP

    For them to look accurate on the Inside they would need permission to reproduce it in the game.

    Whether it be pictures, or the Devs actually going there.

    [Edited by DigitalIP, 12/4/2011 8:59:03 AM]

    Not really, they could have made them look like "Anything" as long as its remotely close to the original most of the people wouldnt care .. i think time limitation is what caused them to completly ignore this part of the game ..

  • Current rank: 2 Stars. Next Rank at 1000 Posts.
    Send a message to infinite_gamer
    ELITE
    infinite_gamer posted on Dec 04, 2011 2:43:25 PM - Report post
     
    I think playing as a female Assassin would be AWESOME!!!
  • Send a message to fullmetal5550_old
    INACTIVE
    fullmetal5550_old posted on Dec 04, 2011 2:48:01 PM - Report post
     
    If they were to do a female assassin I think she would have to be done tastefully. Little to no skin exposed. Plus, she would have to be very intelligent as well.

    [Edited by fullmetal5550, 12/4/2011 2:48:47 PM]
     
  • Tier 7
    Send a message to Shirakani
    TIER 7
    Shirakani posted on Dec 04, 2011 2:52:34 PM - Report post
     
    There's a reason I didn't buy this game. Sure, you can say there's 'new ****', but most of it is the expected mechanics upgrade like hook zipline and what not, there's always LITTLE mechanics upgrades.

    In terms of story content? It's way too short a game. They try to pad out the length by deliberate MMO style time wasting elements. The whole LETS PLAY TOWAR DEFANSE! crap is nothing but a deliberate timewaster. Likewise with the medeterranian defense crap requiring time to just PASS... Reminds me of some MMO's where in order to craft something, you have to AFK and let time pass... oh wait, that's called content right? Pfft.

    Not impressed with this AC... Sure, what story content there is in the game IS GOOD, lets be fair, the story content that exists is very good... but the entire game is not worth full price. Obviously this should have been the '2nd half of Brotherhood'... Brotherhood and this should have been sold together as one game... but... meh, typical of any big game that gets successful, they cut it into bits to sell and milk as much cash as possible.

    Here's hoping AC3 will be a 'full' AC game again. But like with this game, I won't be buying it until I'm sure it's a full game.
  • Send a message to fullmetal5550_old
    INACTIVE
    fullmetal5550_old posted on Dec 04, 2011 2:58:44 PM - Report post
     
    quote:
    originally posted by Shirakani

    There's a reason I didn't buy this game. Sure, you can say there's 'new ****', but most of it is the expected mechanics upgrade like hook zipline and what not, there's always LITTLE mechanics upgrades.

    In terms of story content? It's way too short a game. They try to pad out the length by deliberate MMO style time wasting elements. The whole LETS PLAY TOWAR DEFANSE! crap is nothing but a deliberate timewaster. Likewise with the medeterranian defense crap requiring time to just PASS... Reminds me of some MMO's where in order to craft something, you have to AFK and let time pass... oh wait, that's called content right? Pfft.

    Not impressed with this AC... Sure, what story content there is in the game IS GOOD, lets be fair, the story content that exists is very good... but the entire game is not worth full price. Obviously this should have been the '2nd half of Brotherhood'... Brotherhood and this should have been sold together as one game... but... meh, typical of any big game that gets successful, they cut it into bits to sell and milk as much cash as possible.

    Here's hoping AC3 will be a 'full' AC game again. But like with this game, I won't be buying it until I'm sure it's a full game.

    That is the problem with a yearly release schedule. They can't add as much as they want into it. Plus, doing multiplayer also limits what they can add to it if they have to split up the development team. I would rather they have a development time of two or three years and not work on the multiplayer till after the game is already out.

     
Page 3 of 6   •  First Page  •  Previous Page  •   Next Page  •   Last Page
Signup or Login to Post
All times are (GMT -06:00) Central Time (US & Canada). Current time is 8:03:28 PM