LOGIN  .  SIGNUP   .  SUPPORT 
HOME / MESSAGE BOARDS / GENERAL DISCUSSIONS

General Discussions

Signup   Message Boards Home   Newest Posts   My Favorite Boards   My Threads
Page 6 of 6   •  First Page  •  Previous Page  •   Next Page  •   Last Page
Signup or Login to Post
PC - Opinions wanted...
 
DABhand  posted on Mar 25, 2011 6:30:01 AM - Report post

Current rank: 3.5 Stars. Next Rank at 8000 Posts.
Send a message to DABhand
AUTHOR
As long as either does the job it should be fine, monitors are starting to become the same, in terms of performance most can't be told apart in terms of performance. Only thing that is different that has already been said some offer lower power consumption or extra useless features
 
saurabhfzd  posted on Mar 25, 2011 6:34:25 AM - Report post

Current rank: 3 Stars. Next Rank at 4000 Posts.
Send a message to saurabhfzd
ELITE
quote:
originally posted by DABhand

As long as either does the job it should be fine, monitors are starting to become the same, in terms of performance most can't be told apart in terms of performance. Only thing that is different that has already been said some offer lower power consumption or extra useless features

i hear ya. i guess when it comes right down to it...u juggle between power consumption and price. because i think most companies r going for Full HD now. atleast to me low power consumption is very important so i've gone with the WLED.

 
Drakonis  posted on Mar 25, 2011 7:24:20 AM - Report post

Current rank: 1.5 Stars. Next Rank at 500 Posts.
Send a message to Drakonis
ELDER
quote:
originally posted by DABhand

Ok now your boring..

AMD chipsets do have HT, they used to not have it, but they do have it, but...

Hypertransport is not the same as Hyperthreading, yes threading is Intel's, but AMD has a similar technology and they can't use the same name as Intel so they call it True Core Scalability (TCS) it is the same thing.

As for your link, that was HTLS something again totally different. HyperTransporting vs HT Link Speed is two different entities. Again Hypertransporting is not AMD's equivalent to Hyperthreading.

You really have no clue. Give up.

You have done a general google search and anything it took you hours to find to try and look smart has just blown up in your face.

As for the ME2 planet, I gave people the opportunity but all I got back was ridicule think I was going to help people out then, your head is just as wonky as it was back then. Amazing how people forget I was the one that showed them how to use Ruby to change the configuration of things like run speed etc.

Anyways that was the past, and the present you have shown yourself to be less knowledgeable also.

Oh please, you are the boring one. I never said Hypertransporting was the same as Hyperthreading, I said Hypertransporting could be changed when OCing, you said it could not. You asked me about HT on an AMD chip which is Hypertransporting, you didn't say TCS. Since you were proven wrong you are now changing your tune and putting words in my mouth. You tried to get cute with your so called "trick test", but it didn't work because what I said was accurate.

Even TCS is different in how it works compared to Intel HT. TCS is not hyperthreading. You are the one with no clue. Intel uses "threading", AMD uses "cores" and there is a difference. Its not just AMD using hyperthreading and changing the name. Wow, you really have no clue. You thought ALL CPU's, amd and intel had hyperthreading, they do not. Maybe you should google just to learn something. It is not the same as you claim. If you don't believe me then believe AMD.

blogs.amd.com/work/2010/03/30/intel-hyper-threading-vs-amd-true-core-scalability/


Yes, if I do not know something I will try and learn about it, unlike you who just makes things up. I don't claim to be an expert like you so you just come off worse. And you wonder why people always ask for proof from you. Coincidence, I think not.

You really should give it up.

In regards to ME2 you claimed there was a planet with a special mission but you would never say where. Of course people ridiculed you because there is no such mission. You made things up like you do now and got upset when people called you on it. You then play the victim and complain how you helped people with other issues, like that excuses everything you do. There is no special mission out there, man up and admit it.

Anyways I'm done, there is no talking to someone like you who cannot back up their statements and always changes their arguments.

 
TalonKarde  posted on Mar 25, 2011 7:34:19 AM - Report post

Current rank: 2 Stars. Next Rank at 1000 Posts.
Send a message to TalonKarde
ELITE
might want to add another video card, provided your mobo supports dual cards, today'a games are pretty demanding graphics wise, also good if you're going with a multiple display setup.
 
DABhand  posted on Mar 25, 2011 9:07:06 AM - Report post

Current rank: 3.5 Stars. Next Rank at 8000 Posts.
Send a message to DABhand
AUTHOR
quote:
originally posted by Drakonis

quote:
originally posted by DABhand

Ok now your boring..

AMD chipsets do have HT, they used to not have it, but they do have it, but...

Hypertransport is not the same as Hyperthreading, yes threading is Intel's, but AMD has a similar technology and they can't use the same name as Intel so they call it True Core Scalability (TCS) it is the same thing.

As for your link, that was HTLS something again totally different. HyperTransporting vs HT Link Speed is two different entities. Again Hypertransporting is not AMD's equivalent to Hyperthreading.

You really have no clue. Give up.

You have done a general google search and anything it took you hours to find to try and look smart has just blown up in your face.

As for the ME2 planet, I gave people the opportunity but all I got back was ridicule think I was going to help people out then, your head is just as wonky as it was back then. Amazing how people forget I was the one that showed them how to use Ruby to change the configuration of things like run speed etc.

Anyways that was the past, and the present you have shown yourself to be less knowledgeable also.

Oh please, you are the boring one. I never said Hypertransporting was the same as Hyperthreading, I said Hypertransporting could be changed when OCing, you said it could not. You asked me about HT on an AMD chip which is Hypertransporting, you didn't say TCS. Since you were proven wrong you are now changing your tune and putting words in my mouth. You tried to get cute with your so called "trick test", but it didn't work because what I said was accurate.

Even TCS is different in how it works compared to Intel HT. TCS is not hyperthreading. You are the one with no clue. Intel uses "threading", AMD uses "cores" and there is a difference. Its not just AMD using hyperthreading and changing the name. Wow, you really have no clue. You thought ALL CPU's, amd and intel had hyperthreading, they do not. Maybe you should google just to learn something. It is not the same as you claim. If you don't believe me then believe AMD.

blogs.amd.com/work/2010/03/30/intel-hyper-threading-vs-amd-true-core-scalability/


Yes, if I do not know something I will try and learn about it, unlike you who just makes things up. I don't claim to be an expert like you so you just come off worse. And you wonder why people always ask for proof from you. Coincidence, I think not.

You really should give it up.

In regards to ME2 you claimed there was a planet with a special mission but you would never say where. Of course people ridiculed you because there is no such mission. You made things up like you do now and got upset when people called you on it. You then play the victim and complain how you helped people with other issues, like that excuses everything you do. There is no special mission out there, man up and admit it.

Anyways I'm done, there is no talking to someone like you who cannot back up their statements and always changes their arguments.

Wrong you said HT and you meant HT, and one of the links you provided shown HTLS -- WHICH IS DIFFERENT. And you posted it not me, YOU. You provided those links not me. You can clearly see from your previous posts you have no clue what you were talking about.

You are the one scrambling here, and also FYI I said TCS and Hyperthreading are the same thing, I didn't see they would be exactly the same - that would be like calling Elephants who are not all the same size, non-elephants.

AGAIN, so you don't completely go start licking windows, HTLS is not the same as HT, the Link Speed has to be increased that is normal, but HT doesnt its a constant, its a feature not a hardware addition.

You simply just DO NOT understand the architecture behind CPU's, hell I guarentee you don't know the basics to a CPU. You don't even understand the basics of RAM, which you have conveniently tried to sneak away from.

I have gave you the correct information, not my problem you don't understand it at all, infact I assume some people with basic knowledge followed what I said with no problem.

You are the one who went on the attack when your view wasn't shared. I responded in kind to the way you post things. So I am in fact defending myself against your attacks. Or do you not see how you started it all? The "SHOW ME PROOF?" usual excuse used by many. That is the same as saying "You are a liar".. nobody takes kindly to that.

Let me make it plainer for you, we can have this discussion like civilized people or you can carry on with your snidey remarks - the latter will give you a warning. Deal? Good.

[Edited by DABhand, 3/25/2011 9:11:54 AM]

 
Shibby  posted on Mar 25, 2011 5:16:08 PM - Report post

Current rank: 4.5 Stars. Next Rank at 20.000 Posts.
Send a message to Shibby
ELITE
quote:
originally posted by saurabhfzd

quote:
originally posted by DABhand

As long as either does the job it should be fine, monitors are starting to become the same, in terms of performance most can't be told apart in terms of performance. Only thing that is different that has already been said some offer lower power consumption or extra useless features

i hear ya. i guess when it comes right down to it...u juggle between power consumption and price. because i think most companies r going for Full HD now. atleast to me low power consumption is very important so i've gone with the WLED.

The one I've picked has the highest power rating here (meaning it's economical) and that was one of the key things for me, I'm not really fussed about the higher screen quality since my eyesight makes it impossible for me to tell the difference lol

Page 6 of 6   •  First Page  •  Previous Page  •   Next Page  •   Last Page
  Post Reply
Go to page: 1  2  3  4  5  6 
All times are (GMT -06:00) Central Time (US & Canada). Current time is 12:42:45 PM